School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Nanonetworking: a New Frontier in Communications
Project Description
Nanotechnology and Nanonetworks
Nanotechnology promises new solutions for several applications in biomedical, industrial and military fields. Nanotechnology enables the miniaturization and fabrication of devices in a scale ranging from one to a few hundred nanometers. At this scale, a nanomachine is considered as the most basic functional unit. Nano-machines are tiny components consisting of a set of molecules able to perform specific tasks at nano-level, such as computing, data storing, sensing or actuation. Nanonetworks, i.e., the interconnection of nanomachines, are expected to expand the capabilities of single nanomachines by allowing them to coordinate, share and fuse information. Nanonetworks can be used as a backbone for the development of more complex systems such as nano-robots and computing devices integrated by nano-processors, nano-memory or nano-clocks.
Because of this, there is the need to define the way in which a single nanomachine communicates with other nanomachines based on their physical and practical limitations. In addition, the interconnection of nanomachines with the micro-world will require the development of nano-micro interfaces. Moreover, the communication among thousands or even millions of distributed nanomachines demands for novel cost-effective hardware and software solutions. Classical communication paradigms need to undergo a profound rethinking and redesign in order to meet the requirements (e.g., size, power consumption, etc.) of these new nanonetworks' applications. Existing networking architectures and communication protocols/software have to be completely rethought in light of these new communication paradigms. [Back to top]
Classical paradigms Vs Nanocommunication
Nanonetworks are not a simple extension of traditional communication networks at the nanoscale: they promote the definition of a complete new communication paradigm. Nanonetworks require innovative communication solutions according to the characteristics of the network components and the communication processes. The main constraints to the application of classical communication paradigms at the nanoscale are:
We address the problem of nano-communication from two different perspectives, namely, the study of the transmission and reception of information encoded by using molecules (Molecular Communication), and the application of quantum mechanics to the design of nano-electromagnetic transceivers based on carbon electronics (Nano-electromagnetic Communication). Apart from the implicit limitations and challenges posted by physically working in the nanoscale (in terms of device manufacturing, deployment and range of operation, amongst others), the main differences from the ICT perspective between nano-communication and traditional communication paradigms can be summarized as follows.
Communication | Traditional | Molecular | Nano-electromagnetic |
---|---|---|---|
Communication carrier | Electromagnetic waves | Molecules | Electromagnetic waves (THz band) |
Signal type | Electromagnetic | Chemical | Electromagnetic |
Propagation Speed | Light | Extremely low | Light |
Medium Conditions | Affect electromagnetic waves propagation | Affect diffusion of molecules | Affect electromagnetic waves propagation |
Noise | Electromagnetic fields and signals | Chemical | Electromagnetic fields, THz band effects |
Power Consumption | High | Low | - |
Molecular communication is a new and interdisciplinary field that spans nano, bio, and information and communication technologies (ICT). Unlike previous communication techniques, the integration of molecular transceivers in nanomachines is more feasible due to their size and natural domain. These transceivers are nanomachines able to react to specific molecules and to release others as a response to an internal command. The high bio-compatibility, the lower power consumption with reference to the classical communication schemes and the exploitation of truly nanoscale structures (molecules) enable the feasibility of this approach for solving nanocommunications problems.
For molecular communication we are evaluating several different nanonetwork architectures whose classification is based on distances:
Components in molecular motor communication systems.
Signal propagation in calcium signaling communication systems.
Encoding of a DNA packet using plasmids.
Encoding of the plasmids in the Au/Ni/Au/Ni/Pt nanorods.
Antenna structure for pheromone reception.
Pollen distribution in first half of mid anthesis.
Light transduction technique scheme.
Left: neuron and axons possibly used to transmit action potential impulses between nanonetworks nodes. Right: Capillary circuit in a token ring implementation example.
We investigate the different architectures, the types of molecules, their concentration and the timing aspects of these molecular communication paradigms. We also investigate and understand the physical channel model behavior from an information theory perspective so that we can develop new communication protocols.
We study the molecule diffusion physical channel, both in terms of molecule emission/reception and molecule propagation. In order to initially tackle the molecular communication problem with the most general framework possible, we are concentrating our efforts in the study of the channel based on free molecule diffusion, modeled using the well known Fick's laws. In this initial solution, the desired information modulates the molecule concentration at the transmitter side. This modulated signal is then propagated by the diffusion process to the receiver side where the concentration is sensed and a received signal is generated accordingly. The membrane of a cell contains a large number of receptors (e.g., neurotransmitter-gated channels involved in synaptic communication), to which these molecules may bind, and emitters (e.g. machinery for neurotransmitter or hormone release), which release molecules for short- or long-range communication.
Scheme of the molecule diffusion communication system used for physical channel modeling.
This physical channel model based on free particle diffusion can be applied to networking architectures involving entities communicating by means of particle diffusion at the nanoscale level. For example, both researches on short-range molecular signaling (e.g., using calcium ions, Ca 2+) and on long-range pheromone communication are governed by this model. [Back to top]
Nano-electromagnetic Communication
The limitations of silicon in terms of size, complexity and power consumption, have motivated the study of new materials that could be used as the building block for the incoming nano-devices. Amongst others, one of the most promising candidates is graphene. This novel nano-material consists of a one-atom-thick planar sheet of bonded carbon atoms densely packed in a honeycomb crystal lattice. The unique quantum properties observed in graphene and its derivatives, i.e., Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) and Graphene Nanoribbons (GNR), have drawn the attention of the scientific community in the recent years. Despite the challenges that manufacturing these structures still pose, nano-batteries, nano-memories, logical circuitry in the nanoscale and even nano-antennas have been proposed since the first discovery of Carbon Nanotubes.
The need for compact and reliable transceivers suitable for the nanoscale motivates the study of the electromagnetic radiation properties of graphene and its derivatives. Up to date, several work has been done both from the radio-frequency and the optical perspectives. The main difference between the two trends relies on the interpretation of the radiation in terms of high frequency waves or low energy photons.
In a RF approach, the possibility to manufacture resonant structures in the nanoscale enables the development of novel antenna designs. According to classical antenna theory, the reduction of the antenna dimensions down to a few nanometers would impose the use of resonant frequencies drastically high. However, the reduced speed of electrons in graphene turns into a reduction of the resonant frequency up to one hundred times below the predicted values. The possibility to define an antenna with atomic precision working at feasible resonant frequencies opens a new set of opportunities.
A few initial antenna designs based on graphene have been proposed so far, such as a nano-dipole or a nano-patch antenna. For an antenna size on the order of a few hundreds of nanometers, these antenna structures can radiate EM waves in the Terahertz Band (0.1-10~THz). At the same time, the emission of photons from nano-structures due to electron-phonon interaction has motivated the study of nanotubes and nanoribbons as optical emitters (and reciprocally as detectors too). Amongst others, it has been recently shown that a quasi-metallic carbon nanotube can emit THz radiation when a potential difference is applied to its ends. Going one step further, nanotechnology will enable the development of optical antennas. An optical antenna is a device able to emit/absorb energy to/from the free-space from/to a confined region with a size on the order of the wavelength of the EM field.
Three possible antenna designs based on graphene.
For all these, we believe that the implicit domain of operation for the incoming nano-devices will be the terahertz band. This result has a twofold effect. First, it encourages the use of graphene-based electronics to address the terahertz radiation generation problem in macro-scale Terahertz communications. Second, more within the scope of nanocommunications, it motivates a study of the Terahertz communication channel for future wireless nanonetworks.
Within this project, we will investigate the Teragertz band, transmission range and energy efficiency of novel EM transceivers and, in light of this, define novel networking protocols and architectures. [Back to top]
The range of applications in which nanonetworking devices are required is astonishingly wide. We can identify five main areas:
You are visitor:
since 01/12/2007.